^^ Take a couple minutes to read the article here, by Christopher Noble.
Though I find myself deeply sympathetic with his premise, that only “people of the Book(s)” can fully value the humanities, there’s a lot about this article that bothers me.
For one, I think he caricatures agnostics and atheists. I don’t find my friends who hold those positions to be less interested in texts and discourse; I think they’re far MORE engaged in the humanities than many religious people.
Second, doesn’t his argument dehumanize people? He’s kind of saying, “The humanities don’t matter unless you believe in God.” But I thought the humanities mattered because all of us are HUMAN …. You know, imago Dei and all that…..
I write. I design. I cook. I read. I make music. I talk to people -- all kinds of people.
I used to teach and hopefully will do so again someday.
My dream job would be a cross between barrista and consultant, with a large helping of international travel and bohemian wandering through concerts, museums, galleries, and open spaces.
Somewhere back in time, my students started calling me "RameyLady" and the name stuck. I like it. There's a Ramey-man too. He's a much better writer but he seems to be too humble to share it with the world....at least, not yet.